Skip to Main content

EJOLT is a global research project bringing science and society together to catalogue and analyze ecological distribution conflicts and confront environmental injustice.See what EJOs are

Latest from the Blog

Designed to fail … and the solutions

By Nick Meynen. While violent conflicts over rare metals used in our phones and laptops continue and e-waste keeps piling up, engineers break their heads over new ways to ensure that …

Walls and the Tiger

By Sushma Kallam and Nick Meynen When a traditional rural community in Southeast India is shattered by so-called “development”, pushing farmers to suicide, all hope seems lost. But determined to save …

EJOLT News

When to count the damage? Economic tools for evaluating liabilities in environmental justice struggles

[BRUSSELS, 20 October 2014] MEDIA RELEASE. The health and environmental implications of fossil fuel exploitation, nuclear waste or mining-related pollution are some of the more well-known effects of the increasing energy …

Success

chevron

Chevron is loosing grip in the Ecuadorian case

GREAT news: the Canadian Bar Association has done an 11th-hour reversal and dropped plans to intervene at the Supreme Court of Canada on behalf of Chevron Corp. in a high-profile battle involving Ecuadorean people. These villagers are trying to enforce a judgment from the Ecuadorean Court against Chevron for environmental pollution by a subsidiary. To fully understand how important this good news is, check the blog we published on this case only last week - and the hyperlinks in it. So maybe, Canada is not like the US (see picture)

Resources

Schermafbeelding 2014-10-20 om 09.35.03

Ejolt report 16: Economic tools for evaluating liabilities in environmental justice struggles. The EJOLT experience

The report can be downloaded here.

Abstract

Collaboration to deploy economic evaluation tools is a recent form of interaction between academia and social movements as a means to pursue more sustainable futures. Specifically, academics and environmental justice organisations (EJOs) conduct monetary valuations, cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) and multi-criteria analyses (MCA), in order to explore and reveal the un-sustainability of environmentally controversial projects. The effectiveness of such evaluation tools for pursuing environmental justice is still a matter of debate.

In this document, we report on the EJOLT project experience of developing evaluation processes between EJOs and academics in the context of specific environmental justice struggles. This resulted in a mutual-learning process that explored the conditions under which CBA, MCA, and economic valuation tools can be either enabling or disabling for EJOs in their struggles for environmental justice.

The outcomes suggest that methods are more effectively used through carefully planned interventions supporting debates on local futures and visions, and when there are complementarities with regulatory and institutional developments. Oppositely, evaluation methods disable local mobilization when they force communities to bring their concerns into assessment schemes that do not fit their own languages and concerns, when they reproduce uneven power relations, or where public decisions have little to do with formulating and advancing ‘reasoned arguments’. Insights on the benefits from science-activism collaboration and recommendations on the use of evaluation tools are finally outlined.

Keywords: evaluation tools, environmental justice, environmental liabilities, cost-benefit analysis, multi-criteria analysis, monetary valuation

Authors: Christos Zografos and Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos  (ICTA-UAB). Contributions by: Cem İskender Aydin (UVSQ-REEDS), Andrea Cardoso (ICTA-UAB), Paul Matiku and  Serah Munguti, (Nature Kenya), Martin O’Connor (UVSQ-REEDS), Godwin Ojo (ERA/FotEN), Begum Özkaynak (Boğaziçi University), Todor Slavov and Desislava Stoyanova (Za Zemiata), Lidija Živčič (Focus)

The EJOLT project (2011-15) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 266642. The views and opinions expressed in the website and in all EJOLT publications and documentaries including the Atlas reflect the authors’ view and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.


Twitter